<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lead Generation on Founder-Led Growth</title><link>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/tags/lead-generation/</link><description>Recent content in Lead Generation on Founder-Led Growth</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thefounderisthebrand.com/tags/lead-generation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Is content marketing still worth it and reliable for getting clients, or is it broken now?</title><link>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/is-content-marketing-still-worth-it-or-broken/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/is-content-marketing-still-worth-it-or-broken/</guid><description>&lt;p>Content marketing still works — but the &lt;em>old&lt;/em> playbook is broken, and people confuse the two. Generic, keyword-stuffed blog posts written to rank on Google are dying, because AI answers now absorb that information and give it to people without the click. What&amp;rsquo;s more reliable than ever is content built on a genuine point of view and distributed where your buyers actually spend time. The channel isn&amp;rsquo;t broken; the commodity version of it is.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Has anyone actually executed founder-led growth on LinkedIn — what did the system (lead magnets, post structure, playbook) look like?</title><link>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/what-does-a-founder-led-growth-system-on-linkedin-look-like/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/what-does-a-founder-led-growth-system-on-linkedin-look-like/</guid><description>&lt;p>Yes — the founders who make founder-led growth work on LinkedIn run a repeatable system, not inspiration-driven posting. The system has four parts: a defined content mix, a consistent post structure, a soft lead magnet that captures interest without a hard sell, and a cadence they actually sustain. The founders who fail almost always skipped the &amp;ldquo;repeatable&amp;rdquo; part and treated it as posting when they felt like it.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="the-content-mix">The content mix&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>A working founder feed is not all one thing. A simple, durable split is roughly 40% problem/insight posts (the buyer&amp;rsquo;s problem and how to think about it), 30% proof (results, case snippets, lessons from real work), 20% point of view (opinions that position you), and 10% personal (who you are, why you do this). The exact ratio matters less than the principle: mostly useful to buyers, occasionally human, rarely a pitch. If it is tied to &lt;a href="https://thefounderisthebrand.com/does-founder-led-content-actually-drive-demand-and-clients/">real buyer problems, it drives demand&lt;/a>; if it is metrics and milestones, it just &lt;a href="https://thefounderisthebrand.com/does-building-in-public-actually-work/">attracts other founders&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>What's the difference between demand gen, brand awareness, and lead gen — and where should a B2B SaaS founder put the budget?</title><link>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/demand-gen-vs-brand-awareness-vs-lead-gen-where-to-put-budget/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thefounderisthebrand.com/demand-gen-vs-brand-awareness-vs-lead-gen-where-to-put-budget/</guid><description>&lt;p>In one line each: brand awareness makes people know you exist, demand gen makes them &lt;em>want&lt;/em> what you do, and lead gen captures the contact details of people who are already interested. They&amp;rsquo;re a sequence, not competitors. For an early-stage B2B SaaS founder, most of your effort should go into demand gen — creating interest through content — because at any given moment only a small slice of your market is actually ready to buy.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>